> On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 10:33 PM, maikxlx <maikxlx@...> wrote:
>> Apologies if this has been already asked, but what are the rules for using
>> Unicode on the CONLANG list? I couldn't find any guidelines via Google.
>
> Absent all other concerns, I'd strongly encourage full Unicode use at
> every turn.
>
> Note, however, that some of our readers are sight-impaired, and use
> screen-reading software to speak posts for them. Other readers are
> constrained to some other plain-text email client by other factors.
> For maximum "audience penetration", you ought to provide a plain ASCII
> (i.e. USASCII-68) version of anything that uses non-ASCII characters.
>
> For instance, it's typical when providing a plain ASCII transcription
> to write a following apostrophe for an acute accent, or a following
> caron for a circumflex accent.
>
> As far as using Unicode to write things in the IPA, that's
> traditionally transcribed into something called CXS, which is an
> easier-to-type variant of X-Sampa, which itself is a variant of SAMPA,
> a long-standing standard for representing the IPA in plain ASCII.
>
> For more information on CXS, see
http://www.theiling.de/ipa/ and for
> more on SAMPA and X-Sampa see
http://www.phon.ucl.ac.uk/home/sampa/
> and/or
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SAMPA
>
>
>
>
> Paul
>
--
Sent from Gmail for mobile | mobile.google.com
Mark J. Reed <markjreed@...>