Re: Please welcome . . .

Staving Costetin Cornomorus:
>--- Peter Bleackley
><Peter.Bleackley@...> wrote:
>
> > As such, it had to be numbered before
> > them, and was hence termed the zeroth law.
>
>That's just loony.
It's perfectly logical, if a little counterintuitive. After all, we could
hardly have had a fourth law that was more basic than the first.

We're physicists. We don't do common sense.

Pete

Reply