Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: Asha'ille dictionary online, searchable

From:Arthaey Angosii <arthaey@...>
Date:Tuesday, November 23, 2004, 21:30
Emaelivpeith Pascal A. Kramm:
> The format used for browsing by letter or everything on one page is far too > longwinded and unpractical. It would be much more usable if you would put > everything in a table, like you can see on my Ichwara prana dictionary: > > http://www.choton.org/ichwara/dict.html
My lexicon file has 649 entries, with the entire lexicon probably over 1000. I'm not a fan of giant tables (the "entire dictionary" link is there at the suggestion of someone else, as I originally didn't think I wanted one), but apparently others do like them. So I've redone the all-on-one-page dictionary. The part of speech data was giving me trouble, so I'll put that in later when I have time to figure out why it's not showing up.
> Also, it would be nice to add the semantic functions of the words (noun, > verb etc).
I do include this information on the page for each individual entry, in parentheses after the Asha'ille word.
>As probably no one cares when certain words were added, that info > is quite superfluent.
Then you are free to ignore that field. I like knowing how old a word is relative to others, so I keep track of this data. It's been removed from the all-in-one-page version, though.
> Besides this, I think that a search function is quite redundant, as > practically every browser already has a search function that can be used. No > need to re-invent the wheel.
So how do you do fuzzy searches with the browser's search function?
> >I'm developing on Linux and testing with Firefox v1.0PR. > > Why don't you use the final version of Firefox which is already avaiable > since two weeks (Nov 9)?
Because it seg-faulted when I tried to install it with the installer, and it wouldn't compile when I tried to do it myself. Others had similar problems (as per some forum posts), so I figured I'd wait awhile and try again later, in hopes the developers would fix the problem, if it was on their side. Then I forgot about it and haven't tried again. -- AA (watch the Reply-To!)