Re: Pater Noster (purely linguistically)
| From: | Philip Newton <philip.newton@...> |
|---|
| Date: | Thursday, December 2, 2004, 13:11 |
|---|
On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 14:10:43 +0200, Steg Belsky <draqonfayir@...> wrote:
> At least some Christians seem to hold translations up to the
> same level as the original texts.
If not higher -- e.g. people who believe that "If English was good
enough for Jesus [since that's what he spoke, as his literal words
were recorded in the King James Version], then it's good enough for me
[and I don't need to learn foreign languages]!"
Cheers,
--
Philip Newton <philip.newton@...>
Watch the Reply-To!