Re: Kalusa: Replies to several questions raised
From: | <veritosproject@...> |
Date: | Thursday, May 25, 2006, 14:07 |
I'm a programmer. 30 lines of Perl and I could make something
1,000,000. Just keep sending requests.
On 5/24/06, Larry Sulky <larrysulky@...> wrote:
> On 5/24/06, Gary Shannon <fiziwig@...> wrote:
> > > I voted twice positively for "Tapu kisa da zhura. =
> > This table is
> > > blue." That boosted it from 100 to 150 to 167. So if
> > there's a
> > > sentence I really love or really hate, I can
> > single-handedly give it a
> > > very high or very low score. I'm just sayin'.
> > >
> > > Larry Sulky
> >
> > I've been wrestling with this problem. It's easy
> > enough to limit people to one vote per person when
> > it's just some single thing like a poll question, but
> > when hundreds, and potentially thousands of sentences
> > are involed it becomes more difficult to work out a
> > good way to keep track of which sentences a person has
> > or has not voted upon. I'm still trying to solve it
> > though. Any solution would require that people login
> > to the site to establish their "identity", although
> > the login process could be made anonymous and secure.
> >
> I'm not sure it needs solving. How many of us out here think it would
> be a swell use of our time to try to massively skew the results of
> this experiment? I would put worrying about this issue at the bottom
> of the pile. ---L
>