Re: Kalusa: Replies to several questions raised

On 5/24/06, Gary Shannon <fiziwig@...> wrote:
> > I voted twice positively for "Tapu kisa da zhura. =
> This table is
> > blue." That boosted it from 100 to 150 to 167. So if
> there's a
> > sentence I really love or really hate, I can
> single-handedly give it a
> > very high or very low score. I'm just sayin'.
> >
> > Larry Sulky
>
> I've been wrestling with this problem. It's easy
> enough to limit people to one vote per person when
> it's just some single thing like a poll question, but
> when hundreds, and potentially thousands of sentences
> are involed it becomes more difficult to work out a
> good way to keep track of which sentences a person has
> or has not voted upon. I'm still trying to solve it
> though. Any solution would require that people login
> to the site to establish their "identity", although
> the login process could be made anonymous and secure.
>
I'm not sure it needs solving. How many of us out here think it would
be a swell use of our time to try to massively skew the results of
this experiment? I would put worrying about this issue at the bottom
of the pile.  ---L

Reply