> From: Herman Miller <hmiller@...>
> Subject: Re: Collaborative conlang - Third time's the charm?
> To: CONLANG@listserv.brown.edu
> Date: Thursday, October 9, 2008, 9:56 AM
> Gary Shannon wrote:
>
> > The only hurdle to participation would be the
> necessity of learning
> > the handful of placeholder words and the minimal
> grammar so that it
> > would be possible to use the bootstrap language to
> discuss and evolve
> > the emerging conlang.
> >
> > For that it would be necessary first to have a quick
> and easy course
> > of instruction to pick up the bootstrap grammar and
> vocabulary. This
> > would need to be available in many natural languages
> so that people
> > from diverse linguistic backgrounds could all
> participate. The second
> > requirement would be a forum where discussions could
> be held IN the
> > bootstrap language. Finally, an interactive database
> would be needed
> > for registered users to contribute discovered
> vocabulary to the
> > dictionary.
>
> Clearly one of the big obstacles is getting the bootstrap
> grammar and
> vocabulary examples translated into many natural languages.
> One
> alternative approach might be to take advantage of online
> resources that
> either have already been translated into many languages, or
> need no
> translation. You could choose words that have Wikipedia
> articles in many
> languages and link to videos on Youtube, e.g.
>
> S P V O
> TORI EM VOLA UMI TIVA
>
> TORI
http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vogels
> VOLA
http://id.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terbang
> TIVA
http://nah.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ilhuicatl
>
>
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I5GbFgk-EPw
>
> It would be handy if the forum provides an easy way to add
> links inside
> a post, so that proposed new words can be defined in this
> way.