>Which of the following sentences
>are correct in Latin:
>
> Brutus venit Caesarque vincit.
> Brutus venit Caesar vincitque.
>
>Or is it only possibly if the head is first:
> Brutus venit vincitque Caesar.
>
>Or maybe only:
> Brutus venit et Caesar vincit.
>Of the above, only "Brutus venit Caesar vincitque" is ungrammatical, I
>believe. -que always follows the first element of what's being
>linked. This is apparently a common behaviour of clitics
>cross-linguistically, surprisingly - they tend to be first, last or *second*.
Ian