Re: 'and' clitic in Latin (-que) and Kalaallisut (-lu)
From: | Henrik Theiling <theiling@...> |
Date: | Wednesday, April 14, 2004, 19:54 |
Hi!
Philippe Caquant <herodote92@...> writes:
>....
> Anyway, if I'm not
> mistaken, it should be "et CaesarEM vincit"
> (accusative) (or do you mean something else ?).
Nono, I mean 'Brutus comes and Caesar wins'. Both in nominative case.
That's the point about the question: where to put '-que' if
coordinating two complete sentences, if that is possible at all with
'-que'?
**Henrik
Reply