From: | Roger Mills <rfmilly@...> |
---|---|
Date: | Wednesday, January 12, 2005, 3:54 |
Charlie wrote:> >In your various conlangs how do you express the concepts: > >1. to have just > >and > >2. to be about toAnd I wrote:>As for 'be about to'... well, you've just uncovered another gap. Bah. >"Moreresearch is needed". There is invariant _poro_ 'be going to...' but that's not quite the same.> It turns out (on checking the dictionary) that I assigned "be about to" to _poro-poro_ but I don't like that; this thread has got me thinking..........