Re: [NATLANG] Q Re: The Finno-Celtic Conspiracy

Paul Bennett scripsit:

> Of course, to prove a direct Irish/Finnish connection, you would also
> first have to prove that Finnish was not Uralic (or that Irish is not IE),
> and I don't think there's a case that could be convincingly made there in
> either case.
Nooo, he's not a total idiot.  He thinks F-U is an aberrant I-E family,
but that its relationship to Samoyedic is a matter of borrowing.

--
Principles.  You can't say A is         John Cowan <jcowan@...>
made of B or vice versa.  All mass      http://www.reutershealth.com
is interaction.  --Richard Feynman      http://www.ccil.org/~cowan