Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: A new, slightly bizaare, conlang

From:Elliott Lash <erelion12@...>
Date:Wednesday, July 20, 2005, 14:38
--- Henrik Theiling <theiling@...> wrote:

> > !aalza /||a:K\a/ squirrel > n!aalza /n'||a:K\a/ > > Hmm, but for a lateral click the tongue is still > mainly in > (post-)alveolar position, only the click is then > produced with the > sides of the tongue. I think I'd use homorganic n > in front of the > click, so either alveolar or postalveolar, depending > on where exactly > the tongue is for the click. The way it is now > seems strangely > different from the other assimilations.
> Or maybe the click is totally different to what I > think?
This is a good point, I have to think about this a bit more.
> > The collective plural is relatively simple after > all > > that. It is formed with the prefix ba- /b_<a/: > > I like collective plurals. :-) > > Do you allow them to be applied more than once? > Qthyn|gai allows > stacked number endings to give you things like 'two > swarms of locust' > = 'locust-COLL-DUAL'. You could also have > 'locust-DUAL-COLL-SING' = > 'one group of two locusts' (actually, the inner > collective suffix > would be implied, it'd actually be > 'locust-DUAL-SING').
More ideas! But..I think that that may become potentially confusing, however it's worth a thought...my mind has been pulling me in that direction already
> > That's all we have so far, but others are planned. > > These change the meaning of the verb considerably: > > > > di /d'i/ to be located, be at > > lhdi /Kd'i/ to be scattered all about haphazardly > > Klingon?? :-)
Is this a Klingon-y thing? I wasn't aware.
> > lze'vi /K\E?v@j/ to serve, cook > > Why [@j]? You said this happened after uvulars.
You're right...this ought to be /K\e?v_>i/. I did however forget the _> diacritic noting that the /v/ i actually implosive.
> > But beware: you and your co-worker please try not to > be regarded as > wackos by the other co-workers! :-)))
I'm glad you liked it. And I've been worried a bit too. But we do work at "Language Analysis Systems" most people here are linguists of some sort, so I dont feel too bad about...even though I work on the less linguistic-oriented side of the office. !Elliott __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com