Robert <syntax@...> li toki e ni:
>On Monday 13 September 2004 09:04, Isaac A. Penzev wrote:
>> I'm afraid most ppl here are afraid to present anything too much analytical
>> because the others would consider their projects "primitive" or "naive". A
> Yes, I too have noticed that. My only defense to that is the amount of time
>spent on working on these types of languages. Personally I prefer a "simple"
>type of language. My current baby is *very* simple compared to many of the
>others projects, but I meant it to be that way, sort of as a secondary
>language for me to use day to day.
gjax-zym-byn is mostly isolating with some agglutinative bits; it
has suffixes, but they're all whole syllables, many of which could be
considered postpositive particles. I designed it with a simple grammar
because I intended to become fluent in it (and have, to some degree).
- Jim Henry
http://www.mindspring.com/~jimhenry/conlang.htm