Re: Thoughts on my Gwr Language
| From: | Robert <syntax@...> |
|---|
| Date: | Monday, September 13, 2004, 20:40 |
|---|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 13 September 2004 09:04, Isaac A. Penzev wrote:
> I'm afraid most ppl here are afraid to present anything too much analytical
> because the others would consider their projects "primitive" or "naive". A
> year ago I had an idea for a similar project but then changed to smth
> else...
>
> Yitzik
Yes, I too have noticed that. My only defense to that is the amount of time
spent on working on these types of languages. Personally I prefer a "simple"
type of language. My current baby is *very* simple compared to many of the
others projects, but I meant it to be that way, sort of as a secondary
language for me to use day to day.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)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=olXm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----