On Fri, 31 Jan 2003 23:12:16 +0100 Christophe Grandsire
<christophe.grandsire@...> writes:
> En réponse à Robert B Wilson <han_solo55@...>:
> Well, it still looks more etabnannimous than maggelitous. Am I
> correct? :)
yes, but it does have some maggelity. the maggelity just happens to
[completely accidentally ;))] occur where someone will be reading along
and then horribly mispronounce a word at the worst possible moment.
> > normal - -i
> > subjective -(e)n -in
>
> How are those used?
same as in Adunaic. the normal case is used for subject or direct
object, subjective only for subject.
> > construct -u
>
> No plural construct? What is it used for then, or what is it
> replaced by in the
> plural?
the genitive :)))
> > genitive -(v)o -ivo
> > dative -s -is
> > instrumental -ma -ima
> >
> > verbs:
> > triconsonantal:
> > tense: example: _tarh_ 'crawl'
> > present C1-V-C2-C3-i tarhi [t&r]
> > past C1-V-C2-V-C3-a taraha [tar\a]
> > future C1-V-C2-C3-a tarha [tar\]
> >
> > biconsonantal:
> > tense: example: _nak_ 'come'
> > present C1-V-C2-C2-i nakki [n&k]
> > past C1-V-C2-a naka [nag]
> > future C1-V-C2-C2-a nakka [nak]
> >
>
> A Semitic-like structure added to at least etabannery. Niceness :))
thanks :)))
> Christophe.
Robert Wilson
han_solo55@juno.com
fanai kabl dala ninl