Re: 100 Message Limit

I am quite happy with a 100 limit. I think the list is very interesting, but
quite overhelming. the 100 limit guaranties that i can do something else during
the day than reading the lists messages!

>Why not simply ask the list manager to raise the quota?  Is 100 the absolute
>maximum that any list can manage in a day?
>With two lists, we have difficulty cross-pollinating, if you know what I
>mean.  It's hard to keep threads to one topic or ask conlangers to
>"specialize."
>
>Sally
>scaves@frontiernet.net
>Eskkoat ol ai sendran, rohsan nuehra celyil takrem bomai nakuo.
>"My shadow follows me, putting strange, new roses into the world."
>
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Eamon Graham" <robertg@...>
>To: <CONLANG@...>
>Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 7:11 PM
>Subject: Re: 100 Message Limit
>
>
>> I don't know, seems kinda complicated to me, but I guess this could
>> be an argument in favor of the "specialised" workshops Yitzik and
>> Jan have been discussing.  It takes away some of the heavy trafic
>> from CONLANG to groups for people who are specifically interested in
>> that particular area (are there any extraterrestrial conlang
>> groups?  animal language groups?) and then one can share the results
>> of their work and findings with everyone on CONLANG.  _Or_ if you
>> end up with a problem that you need everyone's input on.  I hope
>> everyone sees what I mean, it's late here. :)
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Eamon
>>
>> > I assume I'm not the only one who tried posting and had the message
>returned
>> > because Conlang was over its 100-message limit for the day.  And yes, I
>> > realize that this message won't get to you until tomorrow.  But I'd like
>to
>> > know what you guys think of this idea - making a separate list that we
>all
>> > subscribed to, then we all just post new threads to whichever has less
>> > messages on it.  That way, we'd have essentially double the message
>limit on
>> > a single list.  We would put the notice in the list description that
>this is
>> > only half of a double list, and new members could join both accordingly.
>> > Any thoughts on this?
>> >
>> > Joe Fatula
>>