Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: USAGE: "gotten" (was: Latin) verb examples and tense meanings

From:Nik Taylor <fortytwo@...>
Date:Thursday, January 20, 2000, 22:57
nicole perrin wrote:
> No, I hear this by adults all the time.
Now that you mention it, I have heard "I don't got", but never "Do you got", but perhaps that's just because being an informal usage, it tends to take the informal question-form "Ya got?"
> Hmm, maybe so, but I think "will got" wouldn't be said, "will get" seems > more likely.
Not likely. If got is completely reanalyzed as a present tense, it will be used with auxilaries, no other verb, except "to be", uses a different form with auxilaries. Besides, by that time, "got" will almost certainly cease to be the past tense of "get", perhaps "getted" or just "get" (by analogy with "put" and other monosyllables ending in -t).
> But I still don't think "will got" would be formed...
Don't see any reason why not, it's the logical conclusion of the modern usage.
> Besides, people still say "have" all the time!
Right now they do. But it's possible - indeed, probable, IMO - that lexical "have" will be lost eventually, whether it'll be in, say, a single generation or closer to a century, I couldn't say. I rather hope that it'll occur within my own lifetime, I'd love to see suppletion in action, not to mention seeing my theory proven. :-) I suspect that it'll be retained in the auxillary position, and perhaps in the "need" sense (I hafta). -- 4 Wakalláf watyánivaf plal 273 "Old linguists never die - they just come to voiceless stops." - anonymous http://members.tripod.com/~Nik_Taylor/Conlang/W.html http://members.tripod.com/~Nik_Taylor/Books.html ICQ: 18656696 AIM Screen-Name: NikTailor