Re: tlhn'ks't, ngghlyam'ft, and other scary words
From: | BP Jonsson <bpj@...> |
Date: | Saturday, February 8, 2003, 16:43 |
At 10:32 7.2.2003 +0100, Daniel Andreasson Vpc-Work wrote:
>So consonant length is just as phonemic as vowel length in
>Swedish, that is, not at all.
Or rather: in Swedish you may have consonant clusters consisting of two
identical consonants, which hardly is the same as C length.
There are apparent counderexamples like _hårt_, which may phonetically be
either [hOt`:] or [hO:t`], but it is underlyingly //hOrd+t// so you have
both a morpheme boundary and an underlying potential geminate
here. Actually it is modern spelling which is to blame, since it used to
be _hårdt_.
/ B.Philip Jonsson B^)>
--
mailto:melrochX@melroch.net (delete X!)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
No man forgets his original trade: the rights of nations and of kings sink
into questions of grammar, if grammarians discuss them.
-Dr. Samuel Johnson (1707 - 1784)