Re: SIL Toolbox and IPA Unicode 1.0
From: | Amanda Babcock Furrow <ababcock@...> |
Date: | Wednesday, September 1, 2004, 19:54 |
Philippe Caquant said:
> > In fact, we're cursing every day the f...ing inventor
> > of f...ing 'vi' (Unix) and hundreds of other f...ing
> > tools of the same sort.
Actually, I rather like those Unix tools. vi is the only thing so far
that has given me half a chance of editing the Unicode-characters-within-
a-regular-text-file format that Toolbox seems to want. I'd rather have
a hex editor though... may have to see what's available in FreeBSD's
ports section...
On Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 02:45:19PM -0500, Mark P. Line wrote:
> vi?!? *snicker*
>
> Real hackers use 'cat'.
Ok, I can see where this thread is going *sigh*. Let me try to turn
this around a bit. I'd rather use MySQL to Toolbox any day, but I
really like that auto-interlinearization thing, if I could just get
it to work.
Short of me learning Python and reading Kura source, does anybody know
where I can find an algorithm to parse text into known morphemes? How
do Toolbox and its ilk do it?
Thanks,
Amanda