Re: Conlang with whistles
From: | Jan van Steenbergen <ijzeren_jan@...> |
Date: | Friday, February 21, 2003, 13:27 |
--- Rachel Klippenstein skrzypszy:
> > 1) labial (though all of my whistles involve rounding)
> > 2) retroflexed (probably equal to your alveolar)
> > 3) front trilled (superimpose an alveolar trill on the whistle)
> > 4) back trilled (superimpose a uvular trill on the whistle)
My father had the ability to produce a whistle between his two front teeth, but
I think that had something do to with the way they were placed in his mouth. I
can't do it.
I have no problem with retroflexed whistling, although it's harder to produce a
clear tune and I can't get the 2-3 three octaves that I can get when whistling
normally.
> I'd love to incorporate other whistles, but I have to
> figure out how to make them and then make them in
> syllables first.
Have you considered ingressive whistling? It's very easy to do (as a matter of
fact, when I was a child is learnt to do that before I learnt to whistle
normally). There is even a nice trill to it: when your tongue is immediately
under the opening of the mouth with a small amount of saliva on it.
Another thing, but difficult to practise is multiphonics. I used to have the
ability to whistle two tones simultanuously, but unfortunately I lost it.
Last thing I can think of is whistling overtones.
Jan
=====
"Originality is the art of concealing your source." - Franklin P. Jones
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Everything you'll ever need on one web page
from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts
http://uk.my.yahoo.com
Replies