Re: Unilang: the Phonotactics
From: | David Peterson <digitalscream@...> |
Date: | Wednesday, April 18, 2001, 22:25 |
In a message dated 4/18/01 9:00:29 AM, hr_oskar@HOTMAIL.COM writes:
<< I don't actually know why we have some kind of antipathy to alveolar +
lateral combinations; they exist (in my own natlang, for instance), but
they're rare, so I disallow them here. Anybody here who has a sensible
explanation? >>
My guess (if guessing's allowed) is that with an ell (I'm just calling it
that) you can't remove your tongue from the alveolar position. So, if you
try to pronounce [tl] or [dl] you'll probably end up with a voiceless/voiced
lateral approximant, or an affricate with a [t] and a voiceless lateral
approximant, or something like it. The only other way to do it, as I see,
would be to have a velar lateral rather than an alveolar lateral, because
[tL] and [dL] are pretty easy for me.
-David
Replies