Re: CHAT: Trial of the century?
|From:||Dan Sulani <dan_sulani@...>|
|Date:||Saturday, January 16, 1999, 18:16|
At 07:44 AM 1/16/99 +0200
---Shaul Vardi <vardi@...> wrote:
> Has anyone else noticed a dramatic reduction in flow on the list over
> the last few days?
> Could it be that the American participants (and others) are glued tothe
> televison watching the bizarre events from Washington DC?
>Watch, yes. Glued, no.
> Perhaps we could each offer our conlang versions of the following:
> 1. I didn't inhale.
> 2. My own infidelity is quite a different matter.
> 3. Cigars are for putting in your mouth.
>An interesting linguistic exercise.
In rtemmu one could say:
1. uuras nana hux.
2. lirasnana gzag na pslek mun itihkxere,
auag ga'r` na gbubr`.
3. inano xshu no dbihk no rasbel mun na mo`g no nin.
likehsna rtem zuv tikuhnuh auag inuvuz vaka'a.
A word is an awesome thing.
DO YOU YAHOO!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com