Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: How big

From:Davis, Iain E. <feaelin@...>
Date:Wednesday, June 12, 2002, 14:03
> -----Original Message----- > From: Christopher B Wright [mailto:faceloran@JUNO.COM] > Sent: Wednesday, 2002 May 29 15:00 > To: CONLANG@LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU > Subject: [CONLANG] How big
> How big is too big to change? Sturnan has 1100 words (thank > you, Aidan, because without you, it would be 150 words > lighter) and perhaps five pages of grammar when I condense > it. There are between twenty and thirty pages of text in > Sturnan, much of it horribly outdated. (I've probably done > forty pages, though not all survives.) > > The three questions, therefore, are: > What is the ratio between size and morphability? > How large were your languages when you instituted the last > major change?
<lurk mode off> Strangely, I'm in the middle of a change of that type right now. The language has about 700+ words, and it seems like its progressing slowly...of course, since what I'm doing is fixing the broken phonology that I made when I didn't know what I was doing, I'm probably instituting a greater number of changes than you're planning on. Unfortunately, now that I'm about a 3rd of the way through it, I also realize I'm going to have to rework the pronouns entirely so I'll be doing a few syntactical changes as well. I've been thinking while I'm doing this that I don't want to have to do it again, unless it's in the interest of presenting sound changes because the language has evolved. I probably will feel differently in a few months...after I'm finished. I imagine "how big is too big too change" is dependent on just how much of a perfectionist you are, and how big of change you're really making. 1100 seems like a lot to me right now, since that would be about 400 words more than I'm doing now! A gut feeling is that 2,000 words is the real dividing line, but since I've never been there, I don't know for sure. :) <back to lurking>