Re: Optimum number of symbols
From: | Andreas Johansson <and_yo@...> |
Date: | Saturday, May 25, 2002, 14:17 |
John Cowan wrote:
>Steg Belsky scripsit:
>
> > If the idea is to make the vowel markings in abjads mandatory, i don't
> > think that it's an improvement.
>
>Harping on Mongolian once more, the Manchus decided to write their
>language (which is somewhat distantly related to Mongolian) with
>the Mongolian script, and *unlike* the Mongolians they found its
>representational problems impossible. So they devised the "writing
>with dots and circles", which cleverly disambiguated all the sounds.
>But this is more like Arabic dots than it is like Arabic or Hebrew
>vowel signs, perhaps.
"Mongolians"? Any distinction from plain old mundane "Mongols"?
Andreas
_________________________________________________________________
MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos:
http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx
Reply