Re: conculture list?

Laurie Gerholz wrote:
>
>I'd join too. I've been distracted lately by other projects, but
>I'd guess that fully a half of the material that I have related to
>my conlangs is actually conculture and non-linguistic. I intend to
>include it at my web pages as I get suitable descriptions written
>and drawn. But I usually don't get to talk about it on conlang.
>There have been some nicely creative digressions, but sometimes I
>wonder if we (the digressors) would feel better if we had a more
>appropriate list for it.
There are times when I have felt uncomfortable posting to conlang-L
regarding issues that are not directly conlang related but more
conculture related. I have been trying to keep such posts to a
minimum, but I wish I could have posted more. But now its seems that
there are a lot more conlangers who are into conculture. Are they
inseparable? Maybe we don't need a new list, and maybe I shouldn't
feel uncomfortable posting concultural issues in conlang-L?

-Kristian- 8)