| From: | Caleb Hines <cph9fa@...> |
|---|---|
| Date: | Saturday, August 7, 2004, 5:02 |
Are there many (or even any) natlangs which lack any liquids (such as r and l)? Would it be very plausible for a language to develop without liquids? For example, I believe I've heard that nasals are almost universal. Thanks, ~Caleb
| Philip Newton <philip.newton@...> | |
| Roger Mills <rfmilly@...> |