Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: YAEPT: L[a]unt?

From:Andreas Johansson <andjo@...>
Date:Wednesday, April 9, 2008, 16:56
Quoting "Mark J. Reed" <markjreed@...>:

> There's a story on the BBC site about a village named "Lunt" that is > considering a name change due to vandals who mark up signs to change > the L to a C. > > http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/merseyside/7338151.stm > > Roight. Very funny, ha ha ha. But my question relates to this line: > > "One suggestion is to change it to Launt which would be pronounced the same. > " > > It would? Really? And how is that, exactly? > > I would pronounce "Lunt" as /lVnt/, /lUnt/, or /lunt/. I'd pronounce > "Launt" as /lOnt/ or /launt/. I can't come up with any pronunciation > that makes sense for both spellings...
Since when is making sense a requirement for the spellings of British toponyms? "Launt" = /lVnt/ would still be more regular than Leicester /lEst@/ or everyone's favourite Featherstonehaugh /f&nSO/ ... -- Andreas Johansson