Re: yet another romance conlang
From: | Nik Taylor <fortytwo@...> |
Date: | Wednesday, January 5, 2000, 14:58 |
FFlores wrote:
> Oh, forget the question about vowels. But what is /A<r>/?
Rounded /A/, probably.
> > Ju:dajca is commonly written in boustrophedon style, with alternating
> > lines of latin (left-to-right) and hebrew (right-to-left) scripts.
Didn't notice this the first time. Interesting. They use BOTH Latin
and Hebrew alphabets? How would such a situation develop?
> In any case, *<e'so> doesn't need an accute (<esto> and <aquello>
> don't either).
I thought that when {este}, {ese} and {aquel} were used as pronouns,
they required acutes?
P.S., Steg - is this, perchance, in the same timeline as Brithenig? :-)
--
"Old linguists never die - they just come to voiceless stops." -
anonymous
http://members.tripod.com/~Nik_Taylor/Conlang/W.html
http://members.tripod.com/~Nik_Taylor/Books.html
ICQ: 18656696
AIM Screen-Name: NikTailor