Re: Another Glossotechnia playtesting report
From: | Campbell Nilsen <cactus95@...> |
Date: | Tuesday, March 18, 2008, 0:35 |
Ha! A card game company?
Let us all face the truth: conlanging is an art which is underappreciated at best
and considered seriously deranged at worst.
All of us on this list-good, worthy souls- are trying to change that, but the truth remains.
However, I live on a school campus, with access to serious printing tech. Hmm...
I am seriously broke, so I can't offer much.
"Define 'cynical'."-M. Mudd
----- Original Message ----
From: Jim Henry <jimhenry1973@...>
To: CONLANG@listserv.brown.edu
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2008 7:25:58 PM
Subject: Re: Another Glossotechnia playtesting report
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 6:49 PM, Campbell Nilsen <cactus95@...> wrote:
> Is there any way I could get my hands on a deck?
You could make your own using the information in the
"Composition of the deck" document on my website.
Or if you make me a good enough offer I could mail you one
of my decks. I don't have an automated way of making
decks yet, they've all been made by hand using markers,
pens and blank index cards.
http://www.pobox.com/~jimhenry/conlang/glossotechnia_deck.html
Or -- I think Matthew Haupt has semi-automated the production
of cards for his "Make-a-Lang" game which is (as far as
I can tell) Glossotechnia by another name. He might be able
to send you word-processing files you can use to print
and cut out cards. If so, let me know as well.
I don't think the composition of the deck is settled enough
to justify automated production on a large scale yet. It needs
more playtesting. At some point, I would probably contact a
card game company like Looney Labs with a proposal.
--
Jim Henry
http://www.pobox.com/~jimhenry/conlang.htm