Re: IPA -> Ascii website
From: | Herman Miller <hmiller@...> |
Date: | Friday, October 19, 2001, 2:46 |
On Thu, 18 Oct 2001 21:04:34 +1000, Tristan Alexander McLeay
<zsau@...> wrote:
>Um.. I've seen OE before, but that's obviously not good. If people don't
>mind me making a suggestion:
>
>OE Ligature: <&>
>ae Ligature: <&\>
>u-dashed: <1\>
Lately I've been using [æ] for the ae ligature. The central u is another
problem. Anything out of the ordinary like [1\] would need to be explained
every time it's used. On the one hand, it might be confusing to have lots
of minor variations of ASCII-IPA rather than one or two commonly used
standards. But on the other hand, X-SAMPA is clunky enough that it
practically begs for improvements. It's easy to forget that ["] is primary
stress and ['] is another way to write the palatalized diacritic, while [']
would make more sense as primary stress, and I can't see any reason not to
use [,] for secondary stress. These sorts of minor changes pass by almost
unnoticed, becoming almost a standard of their own.
--
languages of Azir------> ---<http://www.io.com/~hmiller/lang/index.html>---
hmiller (Herman Miller) "If all Printers were determin'd not to print any
@io.com email password: thing till they were sure it would offend no body,
\ "Subject: teamouse" / there would be very little printed." -Ben Franklin
Reply