Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: TRANS: Happiness (& a question for Christophe)

From:Yoon Ha Lee <yl112@...>
Date:Tuesday, October 30, 2001, 23:01
On Monday, October 29, 2001, at 03:58 , Christophe Grandsire wrote:

> En réponse à Yoon Ha Lee <yl112@...>: > >> (Christophe, a question for you or other native French speakers is >> buried >> under "yna," below...) > > Nice to feel needed :)) . >
Mais oui. :-)
>> yna:
[snip]
>> if you're giving generic directions, say in a cookbook or something, >> it >> might >> be translated as a 2nd person--I think of this as similar to the >> French >> use >> of the infinitive-as-imperative, if I remember >> correctly--Christophe?) > > I think so. We also use it in warning panels ("ne pas fumer": no smoking* > ). > It's the normal way to mark written "advice" (written imperative forms > look > much too familiar). >
<nod> Okay, just wanted to check and see if I was remembering that correctly. I'm reminded of Magic: The Gathering cards I've seen printed in Korean, and it's fairly hilarious because the Korean used is about as formal as you can get, even though it's a game that I can almost guarantee no native Korean over the age of 20 would be playing...^_^
> *Funny offtopic note: in French, "smoking" means: "tuxedo", so imagine the > surprise of a French man knowing no English and seeing the panel "no > smoking" > on a wall :)) . >
ROTFL!
> My Astou also has a strange system of personal pronouns. It doesn't make > the > difference between 1st, 2nd and 3rd person, but between "I", "non-I" and > "non- > person", at least in singular. "non-I" can be both 2nd or 3rd person, as > well > as "non-person". But the first one seems to refer to something/somebody > relevant to the discussion, while "non-person" doesn't necessarily. Still, > I > don't know much about the difference. Astou is a dead language (even in > its > history :)) ) like Latin and Sanskrit, and thus it's study depends on the > written materials about it. And they are not very numerous unfortunately. >
That's cool. :-) Now, would things like pets and deities be counted as non-I or non-persons, or is the question not even relevant? Does it have plurals? I suppose I ought to come up with an (optional) way to mark number in Tasratal, I'm just exceedingly lackadaisical about required number-marking in my conlangs. Call it too much background in Korean. =^ ) Yoon Ha Lee [requiescat@cityofveils.com] http://pegasus.cityofveils.com Southern DOS: Y'all reckon? (Yep/Nope)

Reply

Christophe Grandsire <christophe.grandsire@...>