Re: OT: Proving the rule (was Re: OT: Russian in ASCII?)
From: | Peter Bleackley <peter.bleackley@...> |
Date: | Wednesday, January 7, 2004, 15:43 |
Staving Joe:
>Mark J. Reed wrote:
>
>>On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 02:40:22PM +0000, Joe wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Maybe it was borrowed from English. But with 'confirm' it's just
>>>nonsense, anyway.
>>>
>>
>>Not nonsense. The idea is that every rule has an exception, so finding
>>one doesn't constitute disproving the rule. Logically, of course,
>>it doesn't prove the rule, either, but the expression still makes sense.
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>But it does disprove the rule. It proves that the rule does not hold
>for all cases, and is therefore wrong.
It's a legal phrase. An exception cannot exist unless a rule does, so the
existence of the exception proves the existence of the rule.
Pete