| From: | Mark J. Reed <markjreed@...> |
|---|---|
| Date: | Wednesday, January 7, 2004, 15:48 |
On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 03:20:45PM +0000, Joe wrote:> But it does disprove the rule. It proves that the rule does not hold > for all cases, and is therefore wrong.It is not generally applied to universal laws which claim to hold for all cases, but to vague generalities which hold for *most* cases. -Mark