Re: OT: Proving the rule (was Re: OT: Russian in ASCII?)
|From:||Christophe Grandsire <christophe.grandsire@...>|
|Date:||Friday, January 9, 2004, 19:15|
En réponse à Gary Shannon :
>If I understand you correctly what you're sating is
>that the sentence should read: The (need for an)
>exception proves the (existence of the) rule.
Or rather: the (fact that we are talking about an) exception confirms (that
there is a) rule (to begin with) :)) .
Hehe :))) .
You need a straight mind to invent a twisted conlang.