| From: | Christophe Grandsire <christophe.grandsire@...> |
|---|---|
| Date: | Friday, January 9, 2004, 19:15 |
En réponse à Gary Shannon :>If I understand you correctly what you're sating is >that the sentence should read: The (need for an) >exception proves the (existence of the) rule.Or rather: the (fact that we are talking about an) exception confirms (that there is a) rule (to begin with) :)) . Hehe :))) . Christophe Grandsire. http://rainbow.conlang.free.fr You need a straight mind to invent a twisted conlang.