| From: | Gary Shannon <fiziwig@...> |
|---|---|
| Date: | Thursday, January 8, 2004, 20:50 |
--- Christophe Grandsire <christophe.grandsire@...> wrote:> En réponse à Jan van Steenbergen : ><snip>>And as I > said before, "confirm" makes much more sense than > "prove" anyway (the > correct origin of the expression indeed maps quite > well my description with > "confirm").If I understand you correctly what you're sating is that the sentence should read: The (need for an) exception proves the (existence of the) rule. --gary
| Christophe Grandsire <christophe.grandsire@...> |