| From: | Marshall and Endemann <vaiaata@...> |
|---|---|
| Date: | Saturday, May 29, 2004, 2:24 |
Yes, it really is nonsense isn't it! But linguists have been claiming superior status for one language or another an such pseudo-scientific grounds since Babel! Cheers, Chris on 29/5/04 12:56 PM, Javier BF at uaxuctum@YAHOO.ES wrote:>> The first item: somebody here posted an interesting link a few weeks >> ago to Talmy's typology of verbs of motion >> (http://elies.rediris.es/elies11/cap2.htm, if anyone's interested). > > I had already heard about this typology of verbs of motion, but had > a look into that link anyway... only to get nonplussed at this piece > of utter nonsense: > > http://elies.rediris.es/elies11/cap226.htm >