| From: | Mark J. Reed <markjreed@...> |
|---|---|
| Date: | Sunday, January 11, 2004, 17:28 |
MJR> in the public domain program vim ("vi improved")
TM> 'Public domain'? How can it be public domain yet dual-licenced GPL and
TM> charityware? Doesn't being GPL *require* it to have a copyright?
A mistype on my part. I meant "open source", not "public domain"; the
intended contrast was with the original vi editor, whose source code
is proprietary.
-Mark
| John Cowan <cowan@...> |