Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: OT: Old Computer Games (Was: Weekly Vocab #1.1.3 (repost #1))

From:Keith Gaughan <kmgaughan@...>
Date:Thursday, September 14, 2006, 4:09
On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 05:15:34AM +0200, Henrik Theiling wrote:

> But for DOS, I fear the OS and the computer hardware were already too > complex to be emulated well enough for all those picky game engines > that failed to run even on native DOS in most cases. I doubt that > many DOS or Windows games will survive the DOS/Windows time. To save > them, the game engines themselves will probably have to be ported, > which is quite some work. For some block busters, yes (e.g. ScummVM > for Day of the Tentacle etc). But Goblins III for example, can I play > that? Not the most widespread game and thus not too many enthusiasts. > It was one of my favorites.
Actually, a lot of the stuff works just fine under DOSBox[1]. Getting something like a Commodore 64 to run quickly under emulation's a lot harder than getting decent emulation of an old 386 box. Although I haven't been able to get all my old DOS games working perfectly, usually the problem comes down to sound card emulation. [1] http://dosbox.sourceforge.net/
> I am very happy that at least Descent and Doom were ported to Linux by > enthusiasts. > > Hopefully you're right and I am just too pessimistic and I will be > able to play Goblins III under OSUnknown when I am 75. :-)
It appears to work just fine under DOSBox: http://dosbox.sourceforge.net/comp_list.php?showID=489&letter=G
> PS: In the unlikely case that I will still have the floppy(!) disks > the game was on, will I be able to find a computer that has a > floppy drive? Will the floppies still work? They never worked. > Did I back them up early enough?
You could always check an abandonware site. Their legality it a bit dubious, but if you have the original discs, I see no problem. K. -- Keith Gaughan -- kmgaughan@eircom.net -- http://talideon.com/ Many people would sooner die than think. In fact, they do. -- Bertrand Russell

Reply

Henrik Theiling <theiling@...>