Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: retroflex consonants

From:Danny Wier <dawier@...>
Date:Tuesday, January 28, 2003, 23:41
From: "Jan van Steenbergen" <ijzeren_jan@...>

> I have been under that assumption too, but then I was told by a native
speaker
> that Polish _sz_ and _z._ are alveolars and not retroflexes. > Czech, OTOH, is supposed to have retroflexes, I think.
I've read conflicting descriptions. The book I have has <cz>, <sz>, <z.>/<rz> has palatoalveolars /tS/, /S/, /Z/ -- but somewhere on the web I read they're retroflexes. Since you have contrasting and fully phonemic alveolopalatals <c'>/<ci>, <s'>/<si>, <z'>/<zi> (IPA c-curl and z-curl are involved), I tend to think retroflexes would set them off more. Maybe it depends on the locale and the speaker. I know Russian <sh> and <zh> (but not <ch> and <shch> which are always palatized) are realized either retroflex or near-retroflex, once again because of the phonemicity of softness vs. hardness. Don't know about Czech, but I know <r-hacek> is a palatal trill (or something like that), reflected as <rz> in Polish but pronounced as the much less difficult /Z/ (or /z`/?). ObConlang: Tech has retroflexes in most dialects; they result from backing of Proto-Tech palatals <c'>, <3'>, <c'`> (ejective/glottalized), <s'>, <z'>, <n'>, <r'>, <l'> and <y> before <a>/<@> and (in this case with a secondary articulation of /w/) <u>/<o>. Backed <y> is a retroflex continuant, like English <r>. The same remained palatal before <i>/<e>, where IPA c-curl and z-curl are found for the affricates. The inspiration for these: Northwest Caucasian, of course!