From: | Danny Wier <dawier@...> |
---|---|
Date: | Wednesday, January 29, 2003, 3:18 |
So now we got both an English pronunciation thread and a Polish pronunciation thread, and it's all my fault!! What's next, Mandarin? Somali? Klingon? Just watched the State of the Union address. Hail to the chimp. Anybody ever heard of a "nucular weapon" by the way? (Thus ended my off-topic banter. Now let us discuss conlanging and sex.) ----- Original Message ----- From: "Josh Brandt-Young" <vionau@...> To: <CONLANG@...> Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 8:09 PM Subject: Re: retroflex consonants> Quoth Joe: > > > I thought |sz| and |z.| were both postalveolar ([S] and [Z]). Am Iinsane?> > No, just incorrect. :) Believe me, whatever the books may say (perhaps > they're reluctant to describe Polish in terms of retroflexion because it's > such a "European" language), these are absolutely not > postalveolar--pronouncing them so sounds utterly wrong and bad and awful. > The retroflexing causes all kinds of interesting crunchy effects on > surrounding vowels as well, which wouldn't occur if they were merely > postalveolar.
Joseph Fatula <fatula3@...> |