| From: | Peter Clark <peter-clark@...> |
|---|---|
| Date: | Sunday, March 30, 2003, 6:06 |
On Saturday 29 March 2003 07:59 pm, H. S. Teoh wrote:> Hmm, sounds like active languages should better be termed "volitional > languages"?Not quite, but see my response to Sally for the full nitty-gritty. :Peter -- Oh what a tangled web they weave who try a new word to conceive!