Re: THEORY: USAGE/THEORY: Re: Case
| From: | Boudewijn Rempt <bsarempt@...> |
|---|
| Date: | Monday, July 19, 1999, 18:29 |
|---|
On Fri, 16 Jul 1999, Raymond A. Brown wrote:
>
> Oh dear :=(
>
> So it's not a conlang coinage after all, just another example of modern
> jargon misusing classical formations <groan>
>
I did coin a few case names especially for Denden: exessive,
frontive, postive, tegimentive, tangentive, if I remember
correctly. There are such a lot of those case names that even
after one week I can't rightly remember which ones were my own
invention (aided by my personal in-house classicist) ;-).
> The Philistines are upon us!
I've always had a liking for the Philistines and I'm not ashamed to join
them!
> It's time for me to quit the list for a
> couple of weeks, while I recharge the batteries in South Wales.
>
> Pob hwyl!
Insgelijks!
Boudewijn Rempt | http://www.xs4all.nl/~bsarempt