Re: The Language Code, take 2 (or 3)
| From: | Dirk Elzinga <dirk_elzinga@...> |
|---|
| Date: | Thursday, June 12, 2003, 15:05 |
|---|
On Thursday, June 12, 2003, at 12:03 AM, Jan van Steenbergen wrote:
> (Dirk:)
>>> So here's my revision for Type:
>>>
>>> T type
>>> x auxiliary
>>> a -/+ a priori/a posteriori
>>> f fictional
>>> e engineered
>>> p personal
>>> n natural
>>> o other
>
> Great, although I agree with And's suggestion to apply the "a -/+"
> section to
> all non-natlangs.
Then how about:
T type
c constructed
x auxiliary
f fictional
e engineered
p personal
a -/+ a priori/a posteriori (used with any of the "c" categories)
n natural
o other
Dirk
--
Dirk Elzinga
Dirk_Elzinga@byu.edu
"I believe that phonology is superior to music. It is more variable and
its pecuniary possibilities are far greater." - Erik Satie
Replies