Re: The Language Code, take 2 (or 3)
| From: | Mark J. Reed <markjreed@...> |
|---|
| Date: | Tuesday, June 10, 2003, 17:25 |
|---|
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 09:14:06AM -0600, Dirk Elzinga wrote:
> Hey.
>
> Since discussion on the Language Code (such as it was) has died down, I
> now take this opportunity to present the revised version, incorporating
> the comments I received. Feel free to suggest additions or other
> changes.
> t type of script
> f featural (Hangul, Tengwar)
How is Hangul featural? The glyphs may have been designed based on
phonetic features, but it's really just an alphabet.
Anyway, let me try my hand at categorizing Okaikiar:
Tf Pt*p+{7,6}(c)v((c)c) Wctsr++ Ma++i+f++ Sbsovargn Lc+d++125
-Mark
Reply