Re: OT: no cross, no crown (was Re: [TECH] First day of the week)

In the last episode, (On Monday 17 September 2007 05:47:29), Philip Newton
wrote:
> On 9/17/07, MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com <MorphemeAddict@...>
wrote:
> > In a message dated 9/16/2007 1:50:20 PM Central Daylight Time,
> >
> > philip.newton@GMAIL.COM writes:
> > > > Forgotten the acronym, but no religion, politics or atheism on this
> > > > list, please.
> > >
> > > I'd only heard "no cross, no crown", without an acronym.
> >
> > What about discussion about words about cross and crown?
>
> I got confused first, thinking you were asking about literal
> translations of "cross" and "crown". I think now that you're asking
> whether talking about religion and politics as part of conlangery are
> permissible or not; correct me if I'm wrong.
>
> While I can't speak for the policymaker(s), my impression would be
> that this would be fine, as long as people leave out RL religion and
> politics. (What the situation of conlang R/P that closely mirrors the
> creator's R/P and that is presented in an in-your-face way would be, I
> don't know.)
>
> Cheers,
That would be my impression too.

Jeff
--
"Please understand that there are small
European principalities devoted to debating
Tcl vs. Perl as a tourist attraction."

                            -- Cameron Laird