Re: OT: no cross, no crown (was Re: [TECH] First day of the week)
| From: | Philip Newton <philip.newton@...> |
|---|
| Date: | Monday, September 17, 2007, 4:47 |
|---|
On 9/17/07, MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com <MorphemeAddict@...> wrote:
> In a message dated 9/16/2007 1:50:20 PM Central Daylight Time,
> philip.newton@GMAIL.COM writes:
>
> > > Forgotten the acronym, but no religion, politics or atheism on this list,
> > > please.
> >
> > I'd only heard "no cross, no crown", without an acronym.
>
> What about discussion about words about cross and crown?
I got confused first, thinking you were asking about literal
translations of "cross" and "crown". I think now that you're asking
whether talking about religion and politics as part of conlangery are
permissible or not; correct me if I'm wrong.
While I can't speak for the policymaker(s), my impression would be
that this would be fine, as long as people leave out RL religion and
politics. (What the situation of conlang R/P that closely mirrors the
creator's R/P and that is presented in an in-your-face way would be, I
don't know.)
Cheers,
--
Philip Newton <philip.newton@...>
Replies