Thorn in Finlaesk
From: | Paul Bennett <paul.w.bennett@...> |
Date: | Sunday, September 16, 2007, 6:16 |
With many thanks to many people, I'm now down to the following
phoneme/grapheme set in Finlaesk:
Consonants:
p t k ?
f s z S K x
m n (N)
l
w j
Vowels in first syllable:
i i:
e e: @ @: o o:
E O
A A:
Vowels in non-first syllables:
i i~
@ @~
A A~
This is a larger system than Algonquian, and a smaller system than Old
Norse, and I think I like it.
I have (more or less) the following orthography ...
a sc e f h i j k kj l hl m n n o p s sj sk t tj u z ø ·
A sk e f x i j k tS l K m n N o p s S Sk t tS w z @ ?
...plus acute for long vowels, macron for nasal (for i, @, and A), and
ogonek for open (for e and o).
My question is about representing /K/. Every /T/ in ON becomes /K/ in
Finlaesk, but not every /K/ comes from /T/. Bearing in mind that in this
AU, there is significantly more contact between East Norse and West Norse,
such that the sound /T/ itself will not be unknown (and may yet be
reintroduced via some borrowings and phonemic calques (is there a word for
this?)), does it make sense to write {thorn} for /K/?
Thanks,
Paul
--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
Replies