Re: what makes a con-script a Con-Script?

On Sep 28, 2004, at 9:11 AM, Philippe Caquant wrote:
> But the question is not so simple, as the magazine
> "Science et Vie" (october 2004) tells us, about the
> "Voynich Manuscript". Specialists have been working 4
> centuries on it and they couldn't yet decide what it
> might mean, and does it mean something at all (or is
> it simply a forgery, a hoax).
> There is a site about it: www.voynich.net
> Philippe Caquant

Wired magazine has an article about someone who claims to have
deciphered the Voynich manuscript as not being language, just
semi-random symbols:

http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/12.09/rugg.html


-Stephen (Steg)
  "You know, I rather like this God fellow.
   Very theatrical, you know.
   Pestilence here, a plague there.
   Omnipotence ... gotta get me some of that."
      ~ stewie griffin, _family guy_