Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: RV: Old English

From:Vasiliy Chernov <bc_@...>
Date:Wednesday, March 29, 2000, 13:30
On Tiwesdæg, 28 Mar 2000 22:35:27 +0100, yl-ruil <yl-ruil@...>
gewrat:

<...>
>The diphthong ea was generally smoothed to a short /a/: eall > all, healf > >half, heall > hall, whereas éa /æ:a/ becomes (short) e: >héafod > head, réad > red.
For some reason, OE had _heofod_ rather than _heafod_ (which would better correspond to the forms of other Germanic langs). I am not sure if the vowel length in _heofod_ is evidenced by the OE spellings; modern spelling reflects Middle English open vowel which points rather to short /eo/. More normal was the development without shortening: _hear_, _ear_, _beam_, _stream_, _east_, _beat_, etc.; the shortening in words that end in <-ead> happened later, as evidenced by the spelling.
>> It seems to me that /a/ > /a/ (rather than /æ/) before any back vowel, >> and therefore was not subject to fracturing by 'back umlaut' (which >> happened later, didn't it?). > >Yes, but the _majority_ of texts have sceadu, which implies a fracture >diphthong rather than a simple vowel.
Yes, and this is exactly what I tried to use as the evidence of an early palatalization of <sc>. Fracturing of /a/ through back umlaut was chiefly possible in dialects with 'second fronting'.
>Incedentally, fracturing can be pretty >reasonably dated: it occured at the same time as the development of the >Anglo-Frisian rune-row, since there is a seperate character (ear) for this >diphthong.
Can you explain in more detail? I know too little about runes, and I don't know what the term 'Anglo-Frisian rune-row' is usually applied to. And there were several different processes that yielded short and long <ea>.
>*jungaz is the one which survived, *juwungaz is the earlier form, from PIE >*juwnk´ós, whence *jungaz by haplology.
Therefore, <eo> in _geong_ < /u/ rather than some diphthong. That is, /ju/ > /jio/ > /jeo/ <geo> in WS.
>> There are other examples of vowel fracturing after /j/, e. g. _geoc_ >> 'yoke' ( = Joch, jugum, zygon, etc.). >Granted, cf geolu, yellow.
No, <eo> in _geolu_ ( = German _gelb_) appeared due to back umlaut (absent in this position in the dialect of London: modern _yellow_, not *yollow). And the initial PGerm sound was not /j/.
>Dan
Basilius