Re: Learn MUTLAK the secret language of mutants

>>> fiziwig@YAHOO.COM 01/21/04 01:29PM >>>
--- James Worlton <JWorlton@...> wrote:
> In the first mutation description shouldn't the 'is
> -> is' example be 'is -> iz'? Or are there some
> 'lects where this is [s]? (Someone may have noticed
> this already, I didn't pay much attention to the
> previous replies to this as I am just now getting to
> read the site.)
>
> James W. just proofreading :)
Yes, that's correct.  And I've found a BUNCH of other
errors on the page.

I'm rethinking some of the mutations to get more into
gramtical mutations and less into spelling reforms.
After all, it's the grammatical and lexical mutations
that are the most interesting ones, and I'm finding
the spelling reform mutations distracting.

--gary
=================
I don't find them too difficult, a bit distracting maybe, but to regularize the
spelling is a Good Idea, I think, if the grammar is going to change
significantly. I agree that the /x/ for /th/ is a bit weird (as someone
mentioned earlier), but I'm used to it now (into Ch. 2).

I have also found several errors, but I'll let you rework the system how you
want it before I comment any more on them. :)

James W.